蘑菇视频

Article 8.2(b)

  • Article 1.2
  • Article 10
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 13
  • Article 15
  • Article 16
  • Article 16.1
  • Article 17
  • Article 17.1
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 18bis
  • Article 18bis.1
  • Article 19
  • Article 2
  • Article 20
  • Article 20.2
  • Article 22
  • Article 23
  • Article 24
  • Article 25
  • Article 26
  • Article 27
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(a)
  • Article 29(b)
  • Article 3.1
  • Article 30
  • Article 31
  • Article 31.1
  • Article 4.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(a)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(b)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.4
    • Showing 1 - 1 of 1
    2013-蘑菇视频AT-282, Lauritzen

    On the alleged procedural error of the 蘑菇视频DT not allowing an oral examination of witnesses, 蘑菇视频AT held that it was well within the competence of 蘑菇视频DT to manage its cases as it saw fit and that the Appellant had not demonstrated how the procedure affected or violated her due process rights; 蘑菇视频AT dismissed this ground of appeal. 蘑菇视频AT held, affirming the finding of 蘑菇视频DT, that the Appellant failed to establish that the decision to remove her from her post in Budapest constituted a disguised disciplinary measure. 蘑菇视频AT found no merit in the ground of appeal that 蘑菇视频DT failed to consider that 蘑菇视频HCR...