2025-蘑菇视频AT-1597, Janet Efrati
The 蘑菇视频AT held that the 蘑菇视频DT erred in dismissing both applications as not receivable. Regarding the first application, 蘑菇视频AT found that the Settlement Agreement encompassed all disciplinary sanctions imposed on 9 December 2022, including the deferment of eligibility for salary increment. Therefore, the 蘑菇视频DT was wrong to conclude that the deferment was outside the scope of the Agreement and that the Agreement had been fully implemented. The application for enforcement was properly receivable.
As to the second application, 蘑菇视频AT held that the Administration’s interpretation of the Settlement...
2025-蘑菇视频AT-1604, Christian Castelli
L'蘑菇视频AT a estimé que l'蘑菇视频DT avait correctement conclu que la décision contestée était légale. Il a conclu que l'évaluation préliminaire de la plainte de l'ancien membre du personnel ne révélait aucun motif suffisant pour indiquer que la conduite prétendument insatisfaisante de son FRO pouvait constituer une faute professionnelle et que, par conséquent, il était peu probable qu'une enquête révèle des preuves suffisantes pour poursuivre l'affaire en tant que cas disciplinaire.
Le T蘑菇视频AT a également estimé que le TUD avait correctement identifié la décision faisant l'objet du contr?le...
2025-蘑菇视频AT-1600, Hervé Wamara Tibenderana
L'蘑菇视频AT a estimé que le TSD avait correctement exercé son pouvoir discrétionnaire en rejetant les allégations de racisme au sein de la CAF formulées par l'ancien fonctionnaire, ainsi que son affirmation selon laquelle son avocat avait été traité de manière injuste lors de l'audience du TSD, et en rejetant sa demande de citer l'enquêteur à compara?tre. Néanmoins, l'蘑菇视频AT a conclu que le TSD avait commis une erreur en concluant que les faits à l'origine de la faute présumée avaient été prouvés par des éléments de preuve clairs et convaincants, en particulier dans son évaluation de la crédibilité...
2025-蘑菇视频AT-1594, Ismail Mahmoud Awadat
L'蘑菇视频AT a estimé que le Tribunal du contentieux de l'蘑菇视频RWA n'avait pas commis d'erreur en concluant que la faute de l'ancien membre du personnel était établie et que la mesure disciplinaire de licenciement, assortie d'une indemnité tenant lieu de préavis et sans indemnité de licenciement, était proportionnée au regard du cadre réglementaire de l'Agence. Le T蘑菇视频U a souligné que la fraude et les pratiques collusoires sont considérées comme des domaines très préoccupants et que la faute commise par une personne occupant un poste de confiance, tel qu'un membre du Comité des prêts du Fonds de...
2025-蘑菇视频AT-1534-Corr.1, Dionette Pino Genayas
L'蘑菇视频AT a noté que plusieurs mois après le décès du participant au Fonds, l'appelant avait produit des formulaires Pens.A/2 visant à modifier la désignation du bénéficiaire du règlement résiduel, signés d'une empreinte digitale et non de la signature du participant. L'蘑菇视频AT a également pris note des preuves médicales attestant des signes de démence du participant.
L'蘑菇视频AT a conclu que l'appelant n'avait fourni aucune preuve à l'appui de l'affirmation selon laquelle les capacités mentales du participant s'étaient améliorées au moment où il avait apposé son empreinte digitale sur les formulaires...
2025-蘑菇视频AT-1588, Dorah Likukela
L'蘑菇视频AT a déterminé qu'il avait été démontré par des preuves claires et convaincantes que l'ancienne employée avait commis une faute grave en : i) ne restituant pas à la coopérative de crédit fédérale des Nations Unies (蘑菇视频FCU) des fonds d'un montant de 587 428,65 dollars américains qui avaient été crédités par erreur sur son compte et auxquels elle n'avait pas droit ; ii) n'ayant pas respecté un jugement rendu par la Haute Cour de Zambie (jugement de la Haute Cour), qui lui ordonnait de restituer les fonds susmentionnés à l'蘑菇视频FCU ; et iii) ayant présenté de faux documents et/ou déformé les...
2025-蘑菇视频AT-1583, Martin Akerman
L'蘑菇视频AT a estimé que l'蘑菇视频DT n'avait pas commis d'erreur en concluant que la demande de l'ancien fonctionnaire n'était pas recevable ratione materiae car il n'avait pas tenté de résoudre le litige par l'intermédiaire du Bureau du Médiateur des Fonds et programmes des Nations Unies, comme l'exigeait explicitement l'accord de règlement qu'il avait expressément accepté. Le T蘑菇视频U a estimé que les termes de l'accord de règlement restaient contraignants et exécutoires pour les parties, et que le TNDU n'avait commis aucune erreur en obligeant les parties à respecter ces termes.
Le T蘑菇视频O a en outre estimé...
2025-蘑菇视频AT-1611, Massimo Moroldo
The 蘑菇视频AT held that the only issue on appeal was whether the 蘑菇视频DT erred in finding the additional disciplinary sanction disproportionate and rescinding it. It emphasized that under Staff Rule 10.3(b), sanctions must be proportionate, but the Administration enjoys broad discretion in disciplinary matters, subject to judicial review for lawfulness, rationality, and proportionality.
The 蘑菇视频AT found that the 蘑菇视频DT exceeded its authority by substituting its own opinion for that of the Secretary-General. It noted that the Administration had considered all relevant factors, including the seriousness of...
2025-蘑菇视频AT-1614, Raul Antonio de Melo Cabral
The 蘑菇视频AT held that the 蘑菇视频DT did not err in finding the extensions of administrative leave with pay lawful, as the Administration reasonably assessed the risk to workplace harmony given the appellant’s senior role.
The 蘑菇视频AT agreed that the refusals to complete ePAS evaluations and to approve a subordinate’s workplan and telecommuting request constituted insubordination under Staff Rule 1.2(a), which requires compliance with instructions properly issued by supervisors. It clarified that staff must follow instructions even if they believe them unlawful, unless criminal, and that “properly issued”...
2025-蘑菇视频AT-1534-Corr.1, Dionette Pino Genayas
The 蘑菇视频AT noted that months after the death of the participant in the Fund, the Appellant had produced Pens.A/2 forms purporting to change the designation of the beneficiary of the residual settlement, executed by a thumbprint and not the participant’s signature. The 蘑菇视频AT also noted the medical evidence of signs of the participant’s dementia.
The 蘑菇视频AT found that the Appellant had provided no evidence to support the contention that the participant’s mental capacity had improved by the time of thumbprinting the later forms. The 蘑菇视频AT held that the Fund had not erred when it found those forms...
2024-蘑菇视频AT-1498, Houria Kembouche
The 蘑菇视频AT held that the 蘑菇视频DT did not err in finding that the former staff member’s change of title following a reclassification did not amount to an abolition or discontinuance of her post, rendering her termination of appointment unlawful.
The 蘑菇视频AT also determined that the 蘑菇视频DT did not err in awarding the former staff member compensation in lieu of two years’ net base salary. In this regard, the 蘑菇视频AT emphasized that the 蘑菇视频DT correctly considered the fact that the former staff member’s permanent appointment included a specific undertaking stating that she could only be terminated due to an...
2024-蘑菇视频AT-1494-Corr.1, Zafarkhon Sheralov
The 蘑菇视频AT first considered the staff member’s request for an oral hearing, and decided it was not necessary for the expeditious and fair disposal of his case.
The 蘑菇视频AT observed that when the only persons present in a physical assault are the perpetrator and the victim, an oral hearing may be useful for reaching credibility findings. However, in this case, the 蘑菇视频AT noted that the staff member and his counsel agreed that they had no witnesses to present at an oral hearing and preferred to rely on the investigation report. In these circumstances, the 蘑菇视频DT did not err in not holding an oral hearing...
2024-蘑菇视频AT-1474, Erdinch Lutfiev
The Appeals Tribunal found that the Administration’s decision not to investigate further Mr. Lutfiev’s allegations against his former Chief of Staff was one which it was entitled to make given that the former Chief of Staff was no longer an 蘑菇视频RWA staff member.
Furthermore, the Appeals Tribunal was satisfied that the 蘑菇视频RWA DT’s decision rescinding Mr. Lutfiev’s separation from service was decided erroneously. The Dispute Tribunal applied the wrong methodology to its consideration of the grounds for Mr. Lutfiev’s separation from service and failed to undertake what is known as the four-pronged...
2024-蘑菇视频AT-1469, Parmosivea Soobrayan
The 蘑菇视频AT observed that the Secretary-General elected to limit the scope of his appeal only against the findings of the 蘑菇视频DT with respect to two of nine instances of alleged misconduct by the former staff member. The 蘑菇视频AT further acknowledged that the Secretary-General’s contention was that the 蘑菇视频DT erred in law when it applied the legal tests for harassment and sexual harassment to the two incidents.
Nonetheless, the 蘑菇视频AT held that to determine the issue on appeal required more than simply an application of the correct legal test. To reach any conclusions requires more than simply regard to...
2025-蘑菇视频AT-1612, Jean Daniel Ondo Mvondo
The 蘑菇视频AT held that the staff member’s application was not receivable, as he did not file a timely request for management evaluation of the contested decision.
The 蘑菇视频AT observed that the staff member was notified of the contested decision on 9 November 2023. Accordingly, he had until 8 January 2024 to file his request for management evaluation, but instead filed it on 12 August 2024, more than 270 days after being notified of the contested decision. It further found that, even assuming that he was notified of the contested decision in February 2024, his request was still submitted well...
2025-蘑菇视频AT-1572, Nader Slayyeh
L'蘑菇视频AT a estimé que M. Slayyeh n'avait pas formé de recours en bonne et due forme contre le jugement contesté, mais qu'il avait plut?t introduit une nouvelle demande d'indemnisation qui n'avait pas été soumise au Tribunal du contentieux. L'蘑菇视频AT a jugé qu'il ne pouvait pas soulever en appel une question qui n'avait pas été présentée au tribunal de première instance, car cela constituait une violation des droits de l'autre partie à une procédure régulière et n'était pas conforme au système à deux niveaux d'administration de la justice.
Le T蘑菇视频U a estimé que les recours disponibles en vertu de l...
2025-蘑菇视频AT-1568, Giuseppe Fusco
Le T蘑菇视频AT a estimé que l'蘑菇视频ICEF avait mené le processus de sélection dans le respect total de son cadre juridique administratif, notamment en fournissant des motifs détaillés pour justifier le rejet de la candidature du fonctionnaire. Le T蘑菇视频AT a estimé que sa candidature avait fait l'objet d'un examen complet et équitable et qu'il n'avait pas démontré, à l'aide d'éléments de preuve clairs et convaincants, qu'il avait été privé d'une chance équitable d'être sélectionné. Le T蘑菇视频AT a noté qu'il n'y avait aucune preuve de partialité ou de mauvaise intention à son égard.
Le T蘑菇视频AT a estimé que le fait...
2025-蘑菇视频AT-1609, Anne Christin Raschdorf
The 蘑菇视频AT held that the 蘑菇视频DT did not err in concluding that the former staff member’s application was not receivable because most of the contested decisions were either time-barred, res judicata, or did not constitute appealable administrative decisions. The 蘑菇视频AT found that the Advisory Board on Compensation Claims (ABCC) correctly determined that the claim for compensation under Appendix D remained time-barred under Article 2.1(b) and that the requirements for waiver under Article 2.1(e) were not met, as there was no evidence of incapacity preventing timely filing. The 蘑菇视频AT further held that...
2024-蘑菇视频AT-1427-Corr.1, AAS
The 蘑菇视频AT held that the Inspector General’s Office (IGO) and the Administration failed to properly consider relevant factors brought to their attention during the investigation into the staff member's misconduct. Specifically, they did not considerate the medical context in which the established misconduct occurred, which could have been exculpatory for the staff member. The 蘑菇视频AT found that they failed to investigate and appreciate the potential effects of the staff member's brain tumour and/or treatment on certain aspects of his interpersonal relations with other staff members.
The 蘑菇视频AT held...
2025-蘑菇视频AT-1600, Hervé Wamara Tibenderana
The 蘑菇视频AT held that the 蘑菇视频DT properly exercised its discretion in excluding the former staff member’s allegations of racism within the CAF and his claim that his counsel was treated unfairly during the 蘑菇视频DT hearing, as well as in denying his request to call the investigator to testify. Nevertheless, the 蘑菇视频AT concluded that the 蘑菇视频DT erred in finding that the facts underlying the alleged misconduct had been proven by clear and convincing evidence, particularly in its assessment of the credibility of the witnesses.
Regarding V01’s allegations, the 蘑菇视频AT found that the 蘑菇视频DT improperly explained away...