2023-蘑菇视频AT-1356, Ezzedine Loubani
L'蘑菇视频AT a examiné un appel du Commissaire général de l'蘑菇视频RWA. L’蘑菇视频AT a constaté que le Commissaire général avait re?u l’ordre de prendre une nouvelle décision concernant la demande du fonctionnaire, compte tenu de l’augmentation de ses fonctions et responsabilités en matière de gestion et de budget. L'蘑菇视频AT a estimé que le Commissaire général n'avait pas re?u d'ordre spécifique de reclasser son poste ni de lui accorder une indemnité spéciale ; la DT de l'蘑菇视频RWA avait estimé que le Commissaire général avait le pouvoir discrétionnaire de décider s'il devait ou non être indemnisé. L'蘑菇视频AT a noté que...
2022-蘑菇视频AT-1254, Francoise Xavier Nsabimana
As a preliminary matter, 蘑菇视频AT held that the Joint Appeals Board (JAB) had provided a decision as required by Article 2(10) of the 蘑菇视频AT Statute and therefore 蘑菇视频AT had jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Further, 蘑菇视频AT held that an oral hearing would not assist with the expeditious and fair disposal of the case as required by Article 18(1) of the 蘑菇视频AT Rules of Procedure and therefore denied the request for an oral hearing. 蘑菇视频AT held that there was no error in the JAB’s decision affirming the contested decision of wrongdoing following the Appellant’s failure to report to work and holding of...
2022-蘑菇视频AT-1290, Nael Mohammed Fares Jibril
M. Jibril a fait appel.
En ce qui concerne la demande d'audience, l'蘑菇视频AT a estimé que les questions factuelles et juridiques soulevées par cet appel avaient déjà été clairement définies par les parties et qu'il n'était pas nécessaire de fournir des éclaircissements supplémentaires. De plus, une audience ne contribuerait pas à régler l’affaire de manière rapide et équitable, comme l’exige l’article 18(1) du Règlement intérieur du TANU. En conséquence, la demande d'audience est rejetée.
L'蘑菇视频AT a convenu avec le DT de l'蘑菇视频RWA que la décision administrative contestée de placer M. Jibril en congé...
2022-蘑菇视频AT-1290, Nael Mohammed Fares Jibril
Mr. Jibril appealed.
As regards the request for an oral hearing, the 蘑菇视频AT held that the factual and legal issues arising from this appeal had already been clearly defined by the parties and there was no need for further clarification. Moreover, an oral hearing would not assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case, as required by Article 18(1) of the 蘑菇视频AT Rules of Procedure. Accordingly, the request for an oral hearing is denied.
The 蘑菇视频AT agreed with the 蘑菇视频RWA DT that the challenged administrative decision to place Mr. Jibril on Administrative Leave With Pay (ALWP) was lawful. ...
2022-蘑菇视频AT-1252, Alejandro Izurieta Canova
Oral hearing: Mr. Izurieta Canova applied in terms of Article 18(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the 蘑菇视频AT for an oral hearing to be held in this case. As this is a straightforward matter, not attended by any factual or legal complexity, 蘑菇视频AT did not consider that a hearing would assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case. For that reason, the application for an oral hearing was refused.
The question on appeal was whether the impugned recruitment cancellation decision by the Secretary-General of 蘑菇视频CTAD was a lawful and reasonable exercise of discretion?
The motive for the...
2022-蘑菇视频AT-1200, Elizabeth Dettori
The crucial question on appeal was whether the 蘑菇视频DT committed any error when it only referred for accountability the Chief of Investigations of OIAI but not the ED and other staff members of 蘑菇视频ICEF. The 蘑菇视频AT held that there was no error in the 蘑菇视频DT judgment, because it was within the Dispute Tribunal’s discretion to reject the applicant’s request for referral. The 蘑菇视频DT’s legal approach was correct. The 蘑菇视频DT decided not to refer the ED of 蘑菇视频ICEF for accountability because it was not shown that she had had any influence in the handling of applicant’s complaint. Ms. Dettori also did not show on...
2022-蘑菇视频AT-1275, Hussam Abd AlRhman Al Dirawi
L'蘑菇视频AT a estimé que les faits prétendument inconnus que M. Al Dirawi a détaillés dans sa demande de révision du jugement de l'蘑菇视频AT se concentrent sur les constatations et les conclusions du jugement de l'蘑菇视频AT avec lesquelles il n'est pas d'accord. Notamment, ces questions ont été examinées dans l'appel initial et M. Al Dirawi présente essentiellement un deuxième appel pour une réévaluation des faits dans son cas, un recours qui n'est pas disponible pour les parties une fois que le Tribunal d'appel a rendu un jugement final. L'蘑菇视频AT a donc jugé que la requête de M. Al Dirawi n'était pas...
2022-蘑菇视频AT-1275, Hussam Abd AlRhman Al Dirawi
The 蘑菇视频AT held that the supposedly unknown facts that Mr. Al Dirawi detailed in his application for revision of the 蘑菇视频AT Judgment focus on findings and conclusions in the 蘑菇视频AT Judgment with which he disagrees. Notably, these matters were considered in the original appeal and Mr. Al Dirawi basically submits a second appeal for a reassessment of the facts in his case, a remedy which is not available to the parties once the Appeals Tribunal has issued a final judgment. The 蘑菇视频AT thus held that Mr. Al Dirawi's application was not receivable.
2022-蘑菇视频AT-1192, Andrew Webster
蘑菇视频AT considered an appeal by Mr. Webster. 蘑菇视频AT held that although the current legal framework (ISA Staff Rule 11.2), mentions the establishment of a neutral first instance process with staff participation to take a decision upon any appeal by staff members against an administrative decision alleging the non-observance of their terms of appointment, including all pertinent regulations and rules, there is, to this date, no such neutral first instance process. According to the Staff Rules, the JAB Panel shall submit a report to the Secretary-General, who takes the final decision.
While it is...
2023-蘑菇视频AT-1350, Ismail Said Abu Hatab
The 蘑菇视频AT held that the 蘑菇视频RWA DT correctly exercised its broad discretion with regard to its case management in concluding that the record before it was sufficient to render a decision without an oral hearing. It concluded that the Appellant has not presented any grounds as to why an oral hearing would have been necessary and thus did not show that the 蘑菇视频RWA DT exercised its discretion in such manner as to affect the outcome of the case, as required by Article 2(1)(d) of the Appeals Tribunal Statute.
With regard to the Appellant’s argument that the non-selection decision was unlawful because...
2023-蘑菇视频AT-1356, Ezzedine Loubani
The 蘑菇视频AT considered an appeal by the Commissioner-General of the 蘑菇视频RWA.
The 蘑菇视频AT found that by the Commissioner-General had been ordered to take a new decision with respect to the staff member’s request in view of the increase in his managerial and budgetary duties and responsibilities.
The 蘑菇视频AT was of the view that the Commissioner-General had not been specifically ordered to upgrade his post or to grant him a special allowance; the 蘑菇视频RWA DT had deemed it to be within the discretion of the Commissioner-General to decide whether or not he should be compensated.
The 蘑菇视频AT noted that the...
2023-蘑菇视频AT-1351, Imran Ahmad Shah
The main issue presented in this appeal was whether the 蘑菇视频DT was correct to dismiss Mr. Shah’s application as not receivable ratione materiae because he was not challenging a final administrative decision. The 蘑菇视频AT held that the 蘑菇视频DT correctly found that an interoffice memorandum that changed the reporting lines for all of the staff who worked on the India side of the United Nations Mission Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (蘑菇视频MOGIP) was not an appealable administrative decision because it did not deprive Mr. Shah of his work or affect his functions.
The 蘑菇视频AT also rejected Mr...
2023-蘑菇视频AT-1320, Andrey Chernov
Unat a jugé que, puisque le fils de l'appelant a un handicap, il avait le droit de recevoir des prestations uniquement dans le cadre du programme de subventions d'éducation spéciale ST / AI / 2018/2 (subvention d'éducation spéciale et avantage connexe pour les enfants handicapés) et non dans l'éducation régulière Schéma de subventions ST / AI / 2018/1 / Rev.1 (subvention en matière d'éducation et prestations connexes). 蘑菇视频AT a conclu que, puisque le fils de l'appelant ne faisait pas d'embarquement pendant l'année académique de 2019-2020 et a continué à résider au domicile parental, l'appelant n...
2023-蘑菇视频AT-1340, Mubashara Iram
L'蘑菇视频AT a jugé que l'蘑菇视频DT n'avait pas commis une erreur en jugeant qu'il y avait eu des preuves claires et convaincantes que le membre du personnel avait harcelé d'autres membres du personnel sur une période de temps substantielle et que ce comportement constituait une mauvaise conduite sérieuse. L'蘑菇视频AT a affirmé qu'il y avait des preuves claires et convaincantes pour soutenir les sept allégations selon lesquelles Mme Iram a utilisé un langage abusif, fait des remarques insultantes, crié et victime d'intimidation, engagé dans un contact inapproprié et établi des contacts indésirables avec des...
2023-蘑菇视频AT-1338, Jaime Rodolfo Minzer
L'蘑菇视频AT a soutenu que l'蘑菇视频DT a souligné correctement que le seul recours demandé par le membre du personnel dans sa demande à l'蘑菇视频DT était l'annulation de la décision administrative de ne pas le transférer. Ce n'est que maintenant en appel que le membre du personnel soulève d'autres réclamations et demande en outre le paiement de tous les salaires et des avantages de la date de résiliation à la date du jugement Unat, y compris les prestations de retraite et l'indemnisation des dommages matériels et moraux qui lui sont infligés, causés par harcèlement, mauvais traitements et résiliation illégale...
2023-蘑菇视频AT-1335, Vijay Neekhra
L'蘑菇视频AT n'a trouvé aucune erreur dans le jugement de l'蘑菇视频RWA et a rejeté l'appel. L'蘑菇视频AT a constaté que l'蘑菇视频RWA DT a correctement soutenu que les droits de la procédure régulière de M. Neekhra n'avaient pas été violés par un retard indu dans la procédure d'enquête; que les actions de M. Neekhra visant à copier-coller des extraits provenant de sources internes / externes sans citation appropriée ont été une violation du cadre réglementaire de l'agence et une faute constituée; et que les mesures disciplinaires d'une censure écrite et un report de l'admissibilité à la considération pour la...
2023-蘑菇视频AT-1334, Flavio Mirella
L'蘑菇视频AT a convenu avec l'蘑菇视频DT que l'administration avait montré que la candidature de M. Mirella avait été pleinement considérée comme une considération complète qui satisfait la présomption de régularité et que M. Mirella n'a pas prouvé par des preuves claires et convaincantes qu'il s'est vu refuser une chance équitable. L'inattre a examiné l'affirmation de M. Mirella selon laquelle l'蘑菇视频DT a commis une erreur en concluant que son exclusion de la liste restreinte était conforme à la section 7.4 de ST / AI / 2010/3 (système de sélection du personnel). Plus précisément, l’蘑菇视频AT a évalué l’argument...
2023-蘑菇视频AT-1340, Mubashara Iram
The 蘑菇视频AT held that the 蘑菇视频DT had not erred in holding that there had been clear and convincing evidence that the staff member harassed other staff members over a substantial period of time, and that this behaviour constituted serious misconduct. The 蘑菇视频AT affirmed that there was clear and convincing evidence to support the seven allegations that Ms. Iram used abusive language, made insulting remarks, shouted and bullied individuals, engaged in inappropriate touching, and made unwelcome contacts with individuals at their homes after working hours. The 蘑菇视频AT found that the staff member’s due...
2023-蘑菇视频AT-1338, Jaime Rodolfo Minzer
The 蘑菇视频AT held that the 蘑菇视频DT correctly pointed out that the only remedy requested by the staff member in his application to the 蘑菇视频DT was the rescission of the administrative decision not to transfer him. Only now on appeal does the staff member raise other claims and additionally requests payment of all salaries and benefits from the date of termination to the date of the 蘑菇视频AT Judgment, including pension benefits and compensation for the material and moral harm inflicted on him, caused by harassment, mistreatment, and unlawful termination. His new requests on appeal cannot be accepted by the...
2023-蘑菇视频AT-1335, Vijay Neekhra
The 蘑菇视频AT found no errors in the 蘑菇视频RWA DT Judgment and dismissed the appeal. The 蘑菇视频AT found that the 蘑菇视频RWA DT correctly held that Mr. Neekhra’s due process rights were not violated by an undue delay in the investigation proceedings; that Mr. Neekhra’s actions to copy-paste excerpts from internal/external sources without proper citation was a violation of the Agency’s regulatory framework and constituted misconduct; and that the disciplinary measures of a written censure and deferment of eligibility for consideration for promotion were proportionate to the offense. The 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the...