2013-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-286, Charles
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT noted that the Appellant merely repeated arguments submitted before Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT and recalled that an appellant has the burden of satisfying Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT that the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment was defective and must state the grounds upon which he or she relies, and that merely stating disagreement or repeating previous arguments was insufficient. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Secretary-General¡¯s reports and memoranda lacked the legal authority vested in properly promulgated administrative issuances. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT noted the relevant administrative instruction on the staff selection process (ST/AI/2010/3) was silent on the requirement for...