Guidelines on consideration for conversion to permanent appointment of staff members of the Secretariat eligible to be considered as at 30 June 2009

Showing 1 - 3 of 3

2013-罌厭弝ⅰAT-359, Ademagic et al. and McIlwraith

17 Oct 2013

罌厭弝ⅰAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and an appeal Ademagic et al. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that judgment No. 2013-罌厭弝ⅰAT-357 applied mutatis mutandis and adopted paragraphs 33-82 of that judgment, summarised as follows: 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that 罌厭弝ⅰDT erred in law in finding that the authority to grant permanent appointments to to International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) staff members vested in the ICTY Registrar and, accordingly, vacated the 罌厭弝ⅰDT decision on that basis and upheld the Secretary-General＊s appeal on that issue; 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that each candidate for permanent appointment...

2013-罌厭弝ⅰAT-358, Longone

17 Oct 2013

罌厭弝ⅰAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and an appeal by Mr. Longone. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that judgment No. 2013-罌厭弝ⅰAT-357 applied mutatis mutandis and adopted paragraphs 33-82 of that judgment, summarised as follows: 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that 罌厭弝ⅰDT erred in law in finding that the authority to grant permanent appointments to International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) staff members was vested in the ICTY Registrar and, accordingly, vacated the 罌厭弝ⅰDT decision on that basis and upheld the Secretary-General＊s appeal on that issue; 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that each candidate for permanent appointment...

2014-罌厭弝ⅰAT-428, Kulawat

27 Jun 2014

罌厭弝ⅰAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that 罌厭弝ⅰDT did not properly review the impugned administrative decision to determine whether the Administration had given full and fair consideration to staff members＊ suitability for conversion. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that the Administration had fully complied with Section 1 of ST/SGB/2009/10 and paragraph 5 of the Guidelines, as it must when considering whether a staff member is eligible for conversion. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that 罌厭弝ⅰDT had made a significant error of law in concluding that the impugned decision was unlawful. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that 罌厭弝ⅰDT had erred in...