2019-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-945, Peker
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that it was unable to undertake a proper review of the case since the audio recording of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT proceedings contained the final submissions of both counsels, but not the testimony of the two witnesses and the Appellant. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT erred in rejecting the Appellant¡¯s request for documents relating to the calculation of reasonable and customary expenses as to whether the Administration properly calculated ¡°reasonable and customary¡± expenses was a central issue in contention and was addressed extensively by the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT in its judgment. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT remanded the case to Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT for a de novo...